Can you download edge without windows 10

How can you run a real life browser in a virtual machine ? The speed is not the same ! A Firefox or Chrome on the real system will be faster than a virtual machine with Edge ! The solution is not an option. Also, Windows XP can run a virtual Windows 10 machine, sow we can use Edge on Windows XP ! Dissapointed ! Microsoft OS is a big failure !

PS. Read this citation from a website (not my work):

“If bill gates wouldn’t have locked the market down by burying the best ever designed operating system under tremendous amounts of copyrights and such then our systems would have been much safer and much faster and more stable then anyone could imagine. I’m talking about the one and only true OS that is capable of handling any kind of hardware. They never should have let microsoft be in charge of any OS since their one and only purpose is to exploit the world as their personal money machine.
I’m talking about the good old Disk Operating System (DOS). Don’t forget that Bill gates stole it at the time when the real developers were still working on it although Bill Gates never admitted it. The only proof we got is that even Microsoft was unable to upgrade DOS simply because they hadnt had the slightest idea on how to do that. All later versions of DOS were made by smart young students who, ofcourse, had to give their knowledge to microsoft or face the consequences (lawsuits)
I myself see Bill Gates as a kind of digital Adolf Hitler because he drains the economy worldwide undoubtingly causing real deaths due to the nature of power in this era.
It was said that Unix (the base for all linux/SCO-Xenix) was far better then DOS, but every system analyst who ever worked with them both (like me) will say with 100% certainty : UNIX has limitations which DOS never had and the other way around. The only reason why UNIX was preferrable was because DOS had the nasty RAM limitation
Unix had it’s own problems as well and it took many years to make it possible for the average programmer to use UNIX in a functional matter. (unix was mostly used by big companies with their huge mainframe computersystems)
DOS eventually became the standard for years and microsoft did their best to decode the original DOS created by students (who never worked for MS !)
They succeeded to get rid of the RAM limitation (although not by changing the source but by adding own assembly language) but the orignal DOS was never decoded up to today. (remember that in those days it was common to make an executable (non-decoable) after te programmer finished his work in order to protect his own labour.
The extension used at that time was .COM (which is still being used by windows.
There was a reason for this, namely : when you start up your computer the BIOS will execute a series of tests before handing over control to an operating system. After the test are completed then the BIOS would look for some files to be executed. (actually only 1 file but that’s a very technical story)
The first file the BIOS looked for was COMMAND.COM (which is in essence the heart of DOS) if the BIOS could not find the file it would return an ERROR stating “Disk Operating System not found (DOS !) and you couldn’t use your system untill you inserted a disk with a COMMAND.COM file.
The strangest part of the COMMAND.COM (which never has been decoded !) was that it would do exactly the same as the built-in BIOS and then would look for some files (autoexec.bat, config.sys and some others i cant recall) to execute in a shell environment (the source of the RAM limitation problem!)
Instead of re-programming the COMMAND.COM in order to make any system bootable, microsoft focussed on adding more and more extensions instead of getting rid of limitations of extensions. (extensions could only be 3 characters and no more)
Thus resulting in an OS that was build like a russian doll. (shell around a shell and embedded in a shell) which caused the infamous screens-of-death and still does !
I’m still convinced that if they would put their efforts in developing a brand new DOS orientated OS we could make a giant leap into the future.
Don’t get me wrong, UNIX isn’t better or worse. They both are truly outdated and if nothing changes then we will be stuck with a product which has flaws that can never be corrected directly but only with some twisted workaround. (like the first windows version was nothing more then an attempt to make DOS accesible for the public)

Up until this day our systems haven’t changed at it’s source. For example: the BIOS is still working exactly the same as when the first PC saw the light. It’s still working sequentially which means that it looks for an instruction at the first line (zero) and if the instruction is succesfull then it will go to the next, BUT the BIOS is unable to go backwards, it can only count upwards. When it reaches the last instruction it will release control to the OS (command.com) while resetting itself and waiting at the first instruction. (this is where the source of all SoD’s came from)

In short : our hardware is still running on ancient technology in it’s core and loads of shells are used to prevent our systems to crash due to a reset of the BIOS instruction counter.
Science should be ashamed that after 30 years they still can’t figure out how to create a functional BIOS and OS.

Todays Linux variants proofs that our system’s performance can be enhanced a lot but still the beating heart is out-of-date….

I’m sorry that i didn’t took the time to explain the real technical properties of both BIOS and OS but it would simply be too much and probably too difficult for most people.
It suffices to say that if any programmer who would want to change the BIOS and.or OS he has to use old school assembly language or even binary code ! (zeros and ones)

So students if you want to be famous just create new smart BIOS or even find a way to get rid of the BIOS since it’s the real bottleneck in every computer system.

e.i. : The main task of the BIOS is to check if all hardware works correctly by checking RAM, Keyboard, Display, Disks etc.
Yet due to it’s ancient nature no BIOS is capable of detecting any mouse or USB connected device, which proofs that it’s really ancient and not just a made up story.

Pff im done now, dunno why i actually wrote this since nobody will probable understand or even read it.

Have a nice day !
Arie Klep”